A Simpler Add-on Review Process

Datetime:2016-08-22 22:36:44         Topic: Coder          Share        Original >>
Here to See The Original Article!!!

In 2011, we introduced the concept of “preliminary review” onAMO. Developers who wanted to list add-ons that were still being tested or were experimental in nature could opt for a more lenient review with the understanding that they would have reduced visibility. However, having two review levels added unnecessary complexity for the developers submitting add-ons, and the reviewers evaluating them. As such, we have implemented a simpler approach.

Starting on August 22nd, there will be one review level for all add-ons listed on AMO. Developers who want to reduce the visibility of their add-ons will be able to set an “experimental” add-on flag in the developer tools. This flag won’t have any effect on how an add-on is reviewed or updated.

All listed add-on submissions will either get approved or rejected based on the updated review policy (if you’re interested in the specific changes,this etherpad lists all of them). For unlisted add-ons, we’re also unifying the policies into a single set of criteria. They will still be automatically signed and post-reviewed at our discretion.

We believe this will make it easier to submit, manage, and review add-ons on AMO. Review waiting times have been consistently good this year , and we don’t expect this change to have a significant impact on this. It should also make it easier to work on AMO code , setting up a simpler codebase for future improvements.  We hope this makes the lives of our developers and reviewers easier, and we thank you for your continued support.








New

Put your ads here, just $200 per month.