RDP 8 and Challenging Networks – Limitations

Datetime:2016-08-23 03:38:34          Topic: Windows Server           Share

I’ve written a lot on the performance improvements gained by implementing RDP 8 on my RDPSoft corporate blog over the past 2 years. If you migrate to Windows Server 2012, or soon, Windows Server 2016, and set up RDP to use TCP and UDP as its transport protocols, you will solve a significant number of connection issues you had to contend while running RDP 7 on Windows Server 2008.

RDP 8 and Later – Network Quality Thresholds and Limitations

However, it should be noted that RDP 8 is NOT a panacea for ALL types of networks. Here are my general rules of thumb when it comes to the question of “is RDP good enough?”

1.) If the upper limit of latency between your remote desktop clients and servers is typically less than 300ms

AND

2.) If the average packet loss rate between your remote desktop client and servers is at or less than 2% then RDP 8 on a pure Remote Desktop Services implementation will probably work just fine. And yes, if there’s less latency but slightly more packet loss, RDP 8 may still be able to adapt decently. However, if your remote desktop connections are consistently outside the above thresholds based on your remote worker environments, you will need to consider other protocol technologies leveraged by Citrix. For more on those technologies (e.g Framehawk and ThinWire), please read this wonderful performance “bake off” test conducted by my fellow Microsoft MVP Marius Sandbu that he published on his blog.

Read the entire article here, RDP 8 and Challenging Networks – Limitations

via the fine folks at PureRDS.org.

Follow @DABCC

More Resources:

You May Also Like:

Categories:





About List